Changethe Aspect Ratio to 16:10. Normally the Apex Legends game is set in a 16:9 aspect ratio for visual comfort. This is the native ratio for a large number of monitors out there. If you are using a monitor with an aspect ratio of 16:9, change the setting to 16:10. This will scale the image a little wider.
Actualgood argument tbh. As for me i downgraded from 16:9 to 16:10 because somehow it just feels better lol. 16x10 is a blessed ratio in general, if I wasn't blind as fuck I would definitely use it in CS. It does look good in 16:9. I'll keep 4:3 anyway. For me atleast spraying with AK is easier on 16:9.

Inthis video we compare the three aspect ratios side by side for some different use cases and I talk about my experience of using the three different monito

Thiscan be particularly advantageous in face-paced multiplayer games. One potential drawback of 16:9 resolution is the possible loss of vertical space. Compared to a 4:3 aspect ratio, the 16:9 format may result in a shorter vertical display area. This reduction in verticality heavily relies on vertical exploration or emphasizes a sense of

169 or 16:10? Discussion Looking forward to buy a gaming laptop. And now this aspect ratio decision-making is killing me So basically my priorities are gaming, media

Getequipped for supercharged gaming and creating with NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER, RTX 4070 SUPER, RTX 4070 Ti, and RTX 4070 graphics cards. They’re built

Anydecent PC game will support both, so it doesn't matter. Truth. Although for everything besides gaming, 16:10 is miles better. JoduanER2 said: No, is not better.
PostedJune 29, 2017 (edited) It does affect your sensitivity. 16:9 is 1920x1080 resolution and 16:10 is 1920x1200 resolution (or 1728x1080 depending on how you look at it). Usually 16:9 is better for gaming since there is greater FOV. And greater FOV means faster converted sensitivity - which gives you an advantage over others WellI read that games were actually designed with 16:9 in mind and that, the picture size is fixed horizontally, but flexible vertically. So 16:9 actually gives me a wider view than 16:10which, while offering more pixels, is essentially just "zoomed in". Reply With Quote. 2011-07-01, 08:53 PM #5.
Discussion 21:9 is definetly superior to 16:9 when it works. However I found myself thinking about switching back to 16:9 monitor because for the price of 400€ I can get high-end 1440p, 10-bit high refresh rate IPS panel with amazing response times. While on 21:9 panels that price got me high refresh rate VA panel with not so great response
Thisreign was short-lived, as from 2008 the industry introduced a slight variation: 16: 9 aspect ratio screens began to gain traction and also did so because their output was more efficient.The market was inundated with these kinds of screens and televisions, and by the end of 2012 its success was evident: only 23% of screens were .
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/172
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/469
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/488
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/496
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/18
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/20
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/239
  • z55fip05x3.pages.dev/498

    • 16 9 vs 16 10 gaming